Gold balancing scales

Judicial diplomacy: International courts and legitimation

This article was published on

International Courts carry out a broad range of non-judicial activities, ranging from legal training workshops and public seminars to visits with public officials. Theresa Squatrito's new article in BISA journal Review of International Studies (RIS), examines these activities as a form of ‘judicial diplomacy’, asking how and why ICs employ judicial diplomacy.

BISA Director, Juliet Dryden, spoke to Theresa to take a look at the key findings and what the implications might be for literature on international courts and the legitimacy of international institutions.

BISA members receive access to RIS (and our other journal European Journal of International Security) as a benefit of membership. To gain access log in to your BISA account and scroll down to the 'Membership benefits' section. If you're not yet a member join today.

Full article abstract

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210520000352

Observers of international courts (ICs) note that several ICs carry out a broad range of non-judicial activities, ranging from legal training workshops and public seminars to visits with public officials. Despite the growing prominence of these activities, they have received little attention from scholars. Seeking to fill this gap, this article examines these activities as a form of ‘judicial diplomacy’, asking how and why ICs employ judicial diplomacy. The article argues that ICs use judicial diplomacy as a means of legitimation. They seek to boost institutional legitimacy through their judicial diplomacy by targeting the public and communicating norm-referential narratives about their processes and outcomes. This argument bears out in case studies on the judicial diplomacy of the African Court of Human and Peoples’ Rights and the Caribbean Court of Justice. Both courts are shown to have judicial diplomacy that is public-oriented and people-centred. This argument has important implications for literature on international courts and the legitimacy of international institutions.